Home
Oct 30 2007
Ramblings of a Directory Groupie & Some Directory Freebies
Tuesday, 30 October 2007
I've been wanting to do a post about directories for a while since they've been in the SEO news lately, had thought to post after the flap last month but decided to wait until the firestorm settled. I dislike knee jerk reactions and didn?t want to add to an already over-saturated conversation.

But since the statute of directory topic limitations has run out and with last week's PageRank debacle I thought hmmm... might be a good time to talk about directories still being a viable link source. Of course this will have to get through the current PageRank debates but I suspect enough of us are already tired of all that and will welcome reading about something different.

Directories are like any other business; some are well run and provide a good service while others don?t. My purpose for this post isn?t to point out the less-than-stellar general directories but to showcase directories I consider to be solid and explain why they?re still a viable option for link building. To do that, let?s step back a bit?..

In February of 1994, two Stanford University students started organizing lists of their favorite links to a website they called ?Jerry and David?s Guide to the World Wide Web? . David Filo and Jerry Yang kept adding sites and pretty soon their lists had to be divided into categories and eventually sub categories to stay organized. The site was a hit both on campus and off and in the fall of 1994 the collection of links had a million hit day and almost 100 thousand unique visitors. From that, the Yahoo! Directory was born and so started the boom of commercial human-reviewed directories on the Internet.

Since then a lot of directories have come and gone but their main purpose of providing reviewed resources in a categorized fashion remains. They run the gambit from being personal to institutional lists of sites categorized by human subject experts. Most are commercial, a handful like the DMOZ are not. Websites submitted are placed in one or more categories based on their associated relevance and are usually divided into subject and geographical hierarchies. (I say "usually" because not all directories have geographical categories).

Submitted sites are allowed to provide a business description and in most cases, hyperlinked text. The single thread of commonality all directories share is this human review system. Spiders create databases, humans - directories.

In the early days of the Web/Net, directory editors went out looking to add great sites as a way to attract attention and a search following. It was a tremendous amount of work (and continues to be), but a popular way to search at the time. Gradually engines became more sophisticated and with the millions of sites coming online, the task of hand adding sites became almost impossible. Now, directory owners have to pay staffs to keep updating their properties and charge for submission as a way to cover payroll. Does paying to be listed somehow negate their purpose and objectivity?

I don?t think so. And apparantely neither does Google representative Matt Cutts:

I?ll try to give a few rules of thumb to think about when looking at a directory. When considering submitting to a directory, I?d ask questions like:- Does the directory reject urls? If every url passes a review, the directory gets closer to just a list of links or a free-for-all link site.- What is the quality of urls in the directory? Suppose a site rejects 25% of submissions, but the urls that are accepted/listed are still quite low-quality or spammy. That doesn?t speak well to the quality of the directory.- If there is a fee, what?s the purpose of the fee? For a high-quality directory, the fee is primarily for the time/effort for someone to do a genuine evaluation of a url or site.

I recently made this comment and feel it sums up why you should continue to submit to directories:

The concept of merit based inclusion is what makes securing links in the better directories desirable. It?s reasoned that search engines bestow hub authority on these sites because human review is necessary before a site is included. And since human review is part of the co citation process search engines are programmed to reward, it stands to reason these types of sites would pass link popularity.


I've publically said I thought there were about 25 to 30 general directories worth submitting to and with the exception of my friends at Aviva , they're all still online and kicking up some green. (Meaning money not PageRank, although some would argue it's one and the same.  Hey, it's Halloween, it's fun to stir the pot a little).


It would be naive to say everyone in the directory business is in it to make the world a better place, clearly a large number of directories have come on board as money and/or network makers. I've listed my "stay-away-from" points several times in detail but the main thing I look for is:

If the directory hosts an abundance of  Adsense ads on sub/category pages, then I say pass. Adsense detracts from your submission.


I'm only talking about general directories in this article,  there are tons of niche, geographical, RSS, blog, podcast, video, how-to, etc type directories available to anyone who goes looking. I like the ISEDB for niche directories, and Master New Media for the others.

Here's a portion of the list of directories I generally use. Those sites with stars next to them are directories that have kindly offered to give us a discount code on submission  (for more info on discounts, read below):

GoGuides.org

JoeAnt.com

Best Of The Web (BOTW)*

DMOZ

Ezilon - USA *

Ezilon - UK/Europe*

eWilla*

Massive Links *

Aviva *

Abilogic

Rubberstamped *

WebXperience *

Yeandi

Incrawler

Web World Index

Browse8

Site-Sift *

Web-Beacon

SBDPro

AbleSeek

Webotopia *

Site Snoop

Permanent Listings

Submitting to directories is still a solid, basic foundational linking tactic that offers you a way to get started. Will it net you tons of PageRank, traffic or glory within the search results? Of course not, but every site has to start somewhere so start with the directories.

Want to get started on a directory submission service and save a little dough in the process? 

For a list of directories offering limited time promotional codes on submissions plus directories offering some freebies - head over to the Link Spiel for a list and the all important disclaimers... 

 

 

 
Oct 30 2007
4 Lessons in Online Reputation Management from a Small Town Grocer
Tuesday, 30 October 2007

It's funny how once you get in the mind set of online marketing, you find examples in the least likely places. A few weeks ago while visiting my small hometown in Northeast Ohio I was surprised to find a great example of reputation management from a small company. While the example takes place offline, the four steps they took to manage their reputation could easily (and inexpensively) be reproduced online by any small business.

First, a little background on what caused the reputation problem.

The small town I grew up in was home to a family run grocery store that had served the community for more than fifty years. It was the type of place where the owner was often bagging groceries or ringing up orders along side his employees. As usually happens in situations like this, the aging owner passed away and his sons failed to run the store as well as he did. Competition from national chains was intense and the workers, no longer treated like part of the family, were reluctant to make concessions to help keep the store running.

The store closed.

Not long after, a local company purchased the space and reopened the store. The new owners' other stores were not unionized. This new one is not either. The store refused to negotiate with the union and hired an entirely new staff. The union responded by sending picketers to stand outside the store with signs.

The problem is, the grocery store is set back from the road by a few hundred yards and the road is the main road through town. This means people see the picketers, but don't really have the chance to read their signs. To the average person, it looks like the store's employees are on strike.

In an area of the country dominated by blue-collar jobs, having your employees on strike is a great way to drive customers to the competition. The grocery store had to respond and respond fast to spread the word about what had actually happened.

Here are four steps they took that small businesses can learn from.

You've Got to Advertise

There's a large billboard on the main road in and out of town. This road is the one most traveled by residents on their commute. The company purchased the billboard and is running giant signs stating "Grocery Store X is NOT on strike." It's a simple billboard made up of just five words.

But it's enough to make someone think.

It's actually the way I first learned about the situation. I was on my way to my parents' house for a visit and spotted the billboard. I ended up asking my mom what was going on and getting the full story.

The lesson here? Sometimes you have to buy ads in the right places to get the truth out about your situation. If you're dealing with a PR crisis, properly placed ads can at least start people on the road to the truth. Consider buying relevant AdWords ads for the phrases related to your crisis, especially if you don't already rank organically for the terms. (For example, Mattell bought AdWords space for phrases like "lead paint toy" and "toy recall" and links them to their recall list and public statements about China and lead testing.)

You can also change up your existing brand advertising to address issues. When I wrote my five part series on the Google Nofollow controversy, we changed some of our existing ads on third party sites to a scary font that read "1-2, Google's Coming For You" and "3-4, Drop Your PageRank Score." We then linked those ads directly to the articles rather than to our home page.

When you're in PR crisis mode and you have to set the record straight, there's nothing wrong with buying face-time with your audience. Every small business should have a plan in place to shift their ad dollars (or allocate new ad dollars) to spreading the word about their situation.

Word of Mouth

The first thing I did after spotting the billboard was to ask my mom what the story was. She quickly filled me in, having seen the billboard herself and having gone hunting for information.

Word of mouth and viral marketing work well for selling, but they also work well for reputation management. Just as people are more willing to believe the word of a friend when it comes to liking your product, they're also more likely to believe the word of a friend on what the 'real' scoop about your PR crisis is.

Jet Blue's corporate response to the night of a million cancelled flights is a great example of this. They leveraged social media tools like YouTube and their corporate blog to start the conversation. They issued what appeared to be a sincere apology and outlined specific steps they were taking to remedy the problem. Their response was unique enough and they seeded it in social communities well enough to set things buzzing via word of mouth.

Word moves fast in a small town and it can move fast in online communities as well. The Internet has allowed word of mouth to spread further and faster than it does offline. Getting information about this grocery store from my mom allowed me to consider the situation more quickly and to form a positive response. Learn to leverage the conversation online and you stand a much better chance of defending yourself.

Work the Press

The next step the company took was to get in touch with the local media. They issued press releases explaining the situation and contacted local newspapers and TV news crews. By properly working the news angle (we're being picketed by people who have never worked for us) they managed to get favorable coverage in several local media outlets. This helped get the word to potential customers and lent credibility to the store's version of the story. After all, even a "guilty" company can buy an ad and print something that isn't true.

With newspaper and nightly news coverage, most people are a little more willing to listen to a company's side of the story.

This works online as well. Contacting mainstream media will generally result in online coverage, (often at sites that already rank well, giving you additional chances to capture the search results) but you'll also need to work the blogger and social media sites.

This is one of the reasons it pays to take the time to build relationships with key bloggers and with the social media communities related to your business. You'll have a much easier time getting bloggers to cover your side of the story or having your response spread through social media sites if you are already viewed as a trusted member of the community.

This is the tactic we used last week when Robert and I responded to the toolbar PageRank drop for Search Engine Guide. While Robert has never been a vocal part of this site (preferring to stay in the background running operations), he's been part of this industry for nearly a decade. In that time, he's built up a reputation and earned respect from those in the industry. When word began to spread about our PR drop and various stories about the incident began to circulate based on speculation rather than fact, he responded.

The story went hot on Sphinn in less than thirty minutes and quite a few bloggers and discussion forums linked to his side of the story.

Respond at Your Store

The last thing they did was to add some signage to their store entrance. I stopped by the store to pick up a few items while I was in town and as I entered, I noticed an eight foot sign near the front door. It was a simple enough sign with block lettering and it outlined some facts about the store. It noted things like "33 of our 37 employees live here in 'Smalltown'" and "Our store manager is 'Smalltown' alumni." It then listed the names of every employee from 'Smalltown' and the department they worked in.

As I wandered through the store, I could hear conversations taking place on the same theme. A woman at the bakery was engaged in conversation with the woman at the donut counter. The store worker introduced herself by name and the customer immediately responded "wait, are you so and so's daughter?"

Suddenly the stranger at the store wasn't a stranger, she was the daughter of an old friend. Suddenly the "new" store felt more familiar.

When a PR crisis strikes, people will still come to your web site. In fact, many will come just to test the waters and to see what the big deal is. Respond to them properly and you've got a great chance to win them over. Fail to acknowledge the challenges you face and they may wander away for good.

For decades, a rumor has spread online and off about Procter and Gamble. The rumor says the P&G CEO is a devil worshipper and a large portion of corporate profits support Satanism. It's a ridiculous rumor, but P&G chose to address it. (In fact, the Sally Jesse Raphael show also addressed it, as they were part of the rumor.) They issued a letter to the media, garnered news coverage and included an official statement about the rumor on their web site for years.

Addressing an issue head on at your own web site can be a great way to build credibility and answer the questions of the skeptical. After all, the guilty generally lawyer up and stay mum. While it's a good idea to hire a savvy PR company to help you with your presentation, (or at least to review what you've come up with on your own) you'll need to walk the line between appearing open and appearing defensive. Come across as too defensive and you'll lack credibility.

Putting it to Work

Four simple steps taken by one small town grocer in an attempt to break in to a new market. While they had a slow start, these four tactics have worked well enough to drive business back up. They're making in-roads in the community by reaching out and sharing information.

Your small business can do the same thing online. It's great to have a plan in place for responding to criticism or a crisis, but your plan can't simply focus on the message of your response. It also has to focus on delivery. Thinking these options through ahead of time and building the bridges you'll need to cross if a crisis happens is crucial to managing your online reputation.

Discuss this article in the Small Business Ideas forum.

 
Oct 29 2007
Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Twitter
Monday, 29 October 2007

Up until last week, I had never had much use for Twitter. To me, it was just another inane example of people sharing far more than anyone wants to know about them. Then I stumbled across a fantastic use of Twitter and started having second thoughts. I still can't see the sense in letting the world know who is hanging out in your hotel room, but I am thinking there could be some unique applications for it.

That's why I was pleased to see the new Big Juicy Twitter Guide being put together by Caroline Middlebrook.

Caroline writes:

I first encountered Twitter at least a year ago. I loaded it up and watched the activity on the main Twitter page. All I saw was a seemingly pointless stream of tweets that literally documented every movement of people's daily lives down to the unnecessary detail of what they were eating for dinner! I tried sending a few updates but nobody was following me so I was just talking to myself. I played with it for a couple of hours and then ignored it for a year or so.

Twitter is now being recognized as a valuable marketing tool and I'll explain why in the upcoming sections of the guide. But here's the thing - you don't have to listen to the incoming noise! You can ignore it if you choose to. Unlike email, Twitter is just 'fly on the wall' communication. On the other hand, if you have people following you, you hope they are listening so you can get your message across.

She's got three parts up so far. Check them out:

Part One: What is Twitter?
Part Two: Socializing with Twitter
Part Three: Using Twitter Properly

Caroline has four more parts planned covering tools, mashups, APIs and marketing your feed. They should be interesting reads. (You'll be able to get to all of them from her Big Juicy Twitter Guide page.)

Caroline's series has me thinking about the various uses for Twitter. I'm not sure I agree with her in terms of sending "no more than one tweet per hour" and using it to build up rapport with folks. (I can't see myself subscribing to any Twitter feeds that came more than once or twice a DAY.) That said, I can think of a few ways a good Twitter feed would improve my life.

So off the top of my head...here are a few Twitter style feeds I'd subscribe to:

1.) A subscription to FedEx, UPS or DHL that sends me a message letting me know a package will be arriving today. I work from home but leave the house at least once a day to run the kids someplace or to go work out. It's not uncommon for me to get packages I need to sign for. If I could get a notice on my cell phone telling me a delivery was coming, I'd make sure I was home. Otherwise, I end up driving 30 miles to go pick up the package myself.

2.) A super ultra-discount notice for my favorite stores. Let's say Amazon allows me to sign up for a Twitter feed. They then use the feed to send me a notice that says "for the next hour, products from Company X are 50% off." I'd subscribe. ;) I'd even put up with some regular ad messages from them in exchange for having a jump on super discounts. (Woot! does this)

3.) Ticket notices from a site like Expedia. I hate the game of "how long can I wait before that flight sells out?" Yet I play it all the time. I'd love to be able to subscribe to a Twitter style feed that lets me know when flight seats reach a certain threshold.

4.) Breaking news. I already mentioned this in my post about finally finding a use for Twitter, but it bears repeating. When natural disasters strike, people want updates. If a news company used Twitter responsibly, (Britney's custody case is NOT breaking news) I'd subscribe to a feed that sent me notice of important breaking news. (CNN and others do this)

Basically...anything that I want quicker than e-mail (because let's face it, I'm not always at my computer, though I do always have my phone with me) would be worthy of getting Tweets.

This will leave me doing some brainstorming. I've written Twitter off as inane for quite some time, but the concept is starting to win me over. How about you? How could you use Twitter for your business? What types of tweets would make you sign up?

 
Oct 29 2007
Hey Vanessa: My Thoughts About Zillow
Monday, 29 October 2007

“By the hundreds of thousands they had come, from all over Georgia , all over the South, all over America , all over the world into those subdivided hills and downs and glens and glades of trees?and they were still pouring in.”…Tom Wolfe, A Man In Full

You know Vanessa, I remember checking out Zillow after it launched and being totally awed by the site. With your “Zestimates”, I could easily track the rising value of my home and keep up with the sales comparables in my neighborhood. I can even tell you that one time, after my bank gave me a low-ball appraisal when I went to them for an increase in my home line of credit, I actually sent my branch manager to Zillow to show proof of my home´s value, and that (along with a WTF phone call to upper-level bank management) enabled me to lock in a credit line much higher than originally offered.

As I see it, Zillow has some formidable competition. Cyberhomes has no pretense of community but has a clean, uncluttered look that I prefer. Trulia seems to be a weaker Zillow alternative, but one that must be reckoned with.

How can Zillow win this fight? Vanessa, I know you´ve twittered about user-generated content and while acknowledging the importance of it, I question how you can get critical mass in a subject matter where most people only care about what´s going on in their immediate neighborhood.

Here are a couple suggestions that could change the game in your favor:

Zillow has a feature called “Make Me Move” which enables somebody to place a price on their house that they will theoretically accept from a buyer. Such a number is almost always going to be at the upper level of or over the Zestimate value and certainly above the true market value of the house. Everybody knows this and I suspect few of these user submissions will lead to serious inquiries.

Instead Vanessa, Zillow should create a much more meaningful process that will have a greater likelihood of matching buyer and seller. Put together a serious app where a motivated seller can let folks know that they would consider selling their home and in much the same manner that Priceline uses to get people to make near-market offers for hotel rooms and airline tickets, attempt to guide the seller into naming a realistic price. Then, buyers can register their requirements and the system can attempt to make meaningful matches between buyers & sellers.

Vanessa, did you follow Barry´s attempt to sell his Monsey Condo? He listed with a realtor in a down market and ended up selling to somebody he already knew (while, I assume, still being on the hook for the Realtor fee). Perhaps Barry could have saved himself a commission if he could have tapped into an already existing pool of people looking for comparable condominiums without Realtor assistance.

Right now Vanessa, Realtor Multiple Listing Systems have a near monopoly over the eyeballs of prospective homebuyers. If a buyer doesn´t use an agent to list their home, their ability to successfully advertise and market their home for sale is very limited. If Zillow can create a system that makes it easier for sellers without Realtors to connect with independent buyers, Zillow will gain huge positive mindshare from folks looking to avoid paying Realtors a fee.

Even better, bring this functionality to Facebook and watch it go viral. I´m sure you already have a pretty nice sized user database. Create a Facebook Group, link up with current users and encourage the non-users to join up. Vanessa, I´m sure you can think of many great ways for your user base to deepen their relationship with Zillow once you bring them to the Facebook platform.

However, I have an even more powerful suggestion?

It´s the time of year where homeowners like me get our property tax statements. I have the legal right to appeal my property taxes. Would I like to? Heck, yeah! Will I? Almost certainly not, because the time it would take me to compile the necessary information to appeal plus go through the appeal process isn´t worth the possible savings.

But what if Zillow could do the work for me? You all already possess all the comparable and tax information that I need. Vanessa, what if Zillow could programmatically evaluate my taxes and then advise me whether I have a good case to possibly appeal and if I did decide to appeal, allow me to print out a ready made report containing all the information that I would need to present at my hearing?

Such a service would be unbelievably popular. Once the word got out, Zillow´s website signups would skyrocket and almost assuredly, your user base would then achieve the critical mass that will allow you to put forth other community initiatives. Most importantly Vanessa, Zillow would be an empowering force in people´s lives?allowing folks to challenge a system where inequity runs rampant, resulting in a fairer universal application of property taxation policy.

Vanessa, the fact that you´re allied with Zillow means that the search community is rooting for y´all in Zillow´s epic bloodsport death match against Trulia & Cyberhomes. Hopefully, I´ve given you some ideas that can be translated into initiatives on the cyber-battlefield:.)

Discuss this article in the Small Business Ideas forum.

 
Oct 26 2007
A Little Ditty on the Google Fiasco
Saturday, 27 October 2007

No matter how hard I try, I couldn't get the first two lines of this song out of my head this past week. Figuring it was easier to give in than to fight it (how ironic) I had to sit down long enough to finish it off. Guess this will date me as a child of the eighties.

One, two, Google's coming for you
Three, four, drop your PageRank score
Five, six, take away your clicks
Seven, eight it might be too late
Nine, ten you'll never rank again...

 
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>

Results 111 - 120 of 282
Strategie di mercato