Home arrow News arrow Latest arrow Get Up to Speed on the Paid Links Debate
Jan 03 2008
Get Up to Speed on the Paid Links Debate PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 03 January 2008

Last fall, the paid links debate was raging across the Internet as nearly every industry blog and forum focused in on what Google was demanding and how it would impact everyone's bottom line. I wrote a five part series on the nofollow controversy to bring small business owners up to speed. There's been even more news since then, so you may want to check out an excellent recap by Vanessa Fox over at Search Engine Land.

Vanessa shares some quotes, links and updates on Google's further expansion of "requirements" for the nofollow tag. She shares information from Ted Murphy and Andy Beard, each of whom had conversations with Matt Cutts about how the nofollow tag should be applied in pay-per-post situations.

Vanessa quotes Ted as saying:

I explained to Matt that in SocialSpark all links required by an advertiser would carry the no-follow tag. I thought this would be a great thing. Matt commended the decision, but then added ALL links inside of any sponsored post should carry the no-follow tag period, regardless of whether they are required, not required or even link to the advertiser paying for the post. That means if Nikon pays me to review a camera and I link off to a site about photography that link needs to be no-follow, along with the link to the blog of my buddy the photographer. His reasoning was that the sponsored post wouldn't exist without the sponsor paying for it, therefore all the content is commercial and should be no-follow.

The ramifications of that statement and policy didn't hit me until I was on a jet back to Orlando. Is Google really saying that all content that is commercially driven by a sponsor should carry no-follow tags?

Yes, you heard that right. If Google's stance is really as Ted explains it, Google expects you to nofollow EVERY link in a sponsored post. Even the ones to sites other than the sponsor.

Matt's response was that he'd been taken a bit out of context and while he's not saying Google will "require" the nofollow on those links, it's certainly a good idea.

The full article and the included links will take some time to sort through, but they're an important read for anyone who buys or sells text links, sponsored posts or any other type of sponsored content.


Read more at: http://www.searchengineguide.com/jennifer-laycock/get-up-to-speed-on-the-paid-links-debate.php.
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
Strategie di mercato