| The Great SEO Lie Exposed |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, 06 November 2007 | |
|
I'm not a Google hater. In fact I have no real problems with Google other than the standard fare. I don't always agree with what they do and they, at times, appear to be quite hypocritical. Many would simply chalk that up to big-business. But Google's no Enron, at least not yet. My only real problem is that Google tends to talk out of both sides of its proverbial mouth, and expects the SEO community to take them at face value. But we really can't anymore. Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?" That quote is pulled directly from Google's Webmaster Guidelines, and it's great advice. Unfortunately, Google has shown that, as much as we may want, we really can't build websites for "users" alone. And if search engines did not exist, websites would be developed differently than they are today. This particular lie was exposed very recently when Google fired a warning shot across the bow of many high-profile sites by lowering their toolbar PageRank. This was in response to an update to their help center discussing their policy on paid links. Not all paid links violate our guidelines. Buying and selling links is a normal part of the economy of the web when done for advertising purposes, and not for manipulation of search results. Links purchased for advertising should be designated as such. This can be done in several ways, such as: You'll notice that both of the solutions Google provides for disclosing paid links have nothing to do with the site visitor. In fact, neither solution does anything to benefit the user or even informs them that you've used paid links. No, these solutions benefit someone, but it's not the website visitor. That's quite the contradiction from their longstanding rule of doing things to your site for users rather than the search engines. Read more at: http://www.searchengineguide.com/stoney-degeyter/the-great-seo-lie-exposed.php. Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|